This blog deals with the Jungian/Myers Briggs ( MBTI) psychological functions, and dichotomies which were first developed by psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung, and then interpreted by Isabelle Myers Briggs into the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Our Goal is to provide a simple, precise, and concise explanation clarifying the nature of each of the individual 8 cognitive functions which comprise the 16 Jungian psychological types.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Extraverted Thinking (Te)
Extraverted thinking seeks to form conclusions based on objects, and
their external environment. For the Te user each fact, or piece of
information stands on its own, in other words there is no
interconnections made between the facts themselves. Extroverted thinking
is far more concerned with building things, and using what they have
constructed to serve a practical purpose, it is not interested in
building an interconnected web of relationships between the objects.
Extroverted thinking is always associated with the idea of finding a
“practical application for any given set of data, or facts” although
this is definitely true I venture to present the idea that the main
difference between the extroverted, and introverted thinker lies in the
fact that the ladder generally has “an end game in sight” and seeks to
use the facts, and his understanding of them in order to further his
agenda, and make progress towards that sight, end game or purpose.
Another characteristic of Te is the concept of the modification of the
data, and objects in their external environment in order for it to all
make sense, this is particularly true for types who have Te higher on
their function stacks such as ESTJs, ENTJs, ISTJs, and INTJs. It is
important to note that Extroverted Thinking works in an axis
with Introverted feeling, in other words extroverted thinking serves to
provide a universal and objective logical order to the external world so
that introverted feeling could discern it and make value judgments
based on an internal criteria more specifically they make this judgments
after assessing what, and how much something matters to them on any
given situation. I would like to further accentuate the fact that this
situations are individual, and independent ones which are divorced from
each other, since the value scale is internal. In both the Fe/Ti axis,
and the Fi/Te axis the roles remain the same, meaning that the subject
remains the judge, and the object remains the scrutinized. The
difference between both axis lies in the nature of the subject. More
specifically in the Fi/Te axis introverted feeling which as we mentioned
above makes judgment values based on what he feels matters, and takes
priority for the subject on any given situation makes the judgments, and
Extroverted Thinking formulates a plan as to how the subject will go
about getting what it wants, or in other words, achieving its goals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment