This blog deals with the Jungian/Myers Briggs ( MBTI) psychological functions, and dichotomies which were first developed by psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung, and then interpreted by Isabelle Myers Briggs into the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Our Goal is to provide a simple, precise, and concise explanation clarifying the nature of each of the individual 8 cognitive functions which comprise the 16 Jungian psychological types.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Extraverted Thinking (Te)
Extraverted thinking seeks to form conclusions based on objects, and 
their external environment. For the Te user each fact, or piece of 
information stands on its own, in other words there is no 
interconnections made between the facts themselves. Extroverted thinking
 is far more concerned with building things, and using what they have 
constructed to serve a practical purpose, it is not interested in 
building an interconnected web of relationships between the objects. 
Extroverted thinking is always associated with the idea of finding a 
“practical application for any given set of data, or facts” although 
this is definitely true I venture to present the idea that the main 
difference between the extroverted, and introverted thinker lies in the 
fact that the ladder generally has “an end game in sight” and seeks to 
use the facts, and his understanding of them in order to further his 
agenda, and make progress towards that sight, end game or purpose. 
Another characteristic of Te is the concept of the modification of the 
data, and objects in their external environment in order for it to all 
make sense, this is particularly true for types who have Te higher on 
their function stacks such as ESTJs, ENTJs, ISTJs, and INTJs. It is 
important to note that Extroverted Thinking works in an axis 
with Introverted feeling, in other words extroverted thinking serves to 
provide a universal and objective logical order to the external world so
 that introverted feeling could discern it and make value judgments 
based on an internal criteria more specifically they make this judgments
 after assessing what, and how much something matters to them on any 
given situation. I would like to further accentuate the fact that this 
situations are individual, and independent ones which are divorced from 
each other, since the value scale is internal. In both the Fe/Ti axis, 
and the Fi/Te axis the roles remain the same, meaning that the subject 
remains the judge, and the object remains the scrutinized. The 
difference between both axis lies in the nature of the subject. More 
specifically in the Fi/Te axis introverted feeling which as we mentioned
 above makes judgment values based on what he feels matters, and takes 
priority for the subject on any given situation makes the judgments, and
 Extroverted Thinking formulates a plan as to how the subject will go 
about getting what it wants, or in other words, achieving its goals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment